标题: CR大全-TEST20-T3 [打印本页]
作者: teyvhf 时间: 2004-7-24 15:10 标题: CR大全-TEST20-T3
3. Last year in the United States, women who ran for state and national offices were about as likely to win as men. However, only about fifteen percent of the candidates for these offices were women. Therefore, the reason there are so few women who win elections for these offices is not that women have difficulty winning elections but that so few women want to run.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion given?做错了，选了B，花时2分33秒，论据和论点读得清，感觉答案应该是他因
(A) Last year the proportion of women incumbents who won reelection was smaller than the proportion of men incumbents who won reelection.无关
(B) Few women who run for state and national offices run against other women.无关
(C) Most women who have no strong desire to be politicians never run for state and national offices.支持
(D) The proportion of people holding local offices who are women is smaller than the proportion of people holding state and national offices who are women.无关（E）
(E) Many more women than men who want to run for state and national offices do not because they cannot get adequate funding for their campaigns.支持
论据：1。去年美国州和国家竞选中，女性和男性获胜的可能性一样2。50%的竞争者是女性
结论：得出原因：不是因为女性竞选困难，而是因为女性不愿竞选
做错了，选了B，花时2分33秒，论据和论点读得清，读完后感觉答案应该是他因 可是对五个选项读过去感觉没有一个是对的又反复读 时间没了 只好胡选一个B
对了答案 E 应该是支持啊
E说的是参加竞选的女士比男士多 不是因为他们得不到足够的资金
这个选项排除了资金的原因 所以是支持啊我的思路有什么问题吗 谢谢
作者: qwrersaa 时间: 2004-7-24 15:13
你把（E）选项读错了。(E) Many more women than men who want to run for state and national offices do not because they cannot get adequate funding for their campaigns"do not" 后面省略了 run. 再仔细读一下就豁然开朗了。你做题的感觉其实非常好，只要提高一下阅读。
作者: teyvhf 时间: 2004-7-25 20:40
谢谢夸奖,偶明白了,谢了***************
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |