Board logo

标题: 问og79 [打印本页]

作者: jhiiool    时间: 2004-7-22 10:08     标题: 问og79

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply,"No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?
(A)Why does the part that replies not answer,"Yes"?
(B)why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C)Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D)Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E)Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?
答案是A,请问D为什么不对呢?我看了以前讨论的这道题,也有人问D的,但是没有清楚的回答阿。有谁帮忙解释一下阿,多谢啦
作者: topway7    时间: 2004-7-22 10:09

嗯,以前做过这道, 觉得用排除法是最好了. B肯定不对 C也无关,  D, 这些人会接受suggestion, 回答可能是"那是因为他们被催眠了", 这个回答和后面的解释(有separate parts这个解释)不冲突 E 和D一样, 回答和后面的解释不冲突.


作者: teyvhf    时间: 2004-7-22 10:10

按照题中假设,被催眠的部分1和实验中回答的部分2是分隔的不同部分,2回答(no)是基于1受到催眠(被暗示deaf)后推理得来的回答。2回答no,实际上2是听到的,2没有受到催眠,因为2回答了。可以证实回答的部分2是听到了。

但是这个回答no,与上述被催眠的部分1和实验中回答的部分2是不同部分且互相分割开来是矛盾的。如果是分割开来的,那回答的部分2对于被催眠的部分1是无法了解和沟通的。他不可能依据被催眠的部分1的状态来回答。而应根据他自己部分(2)的状况回答,而2听到了问话,2不是deaf,他应该回答的是yes。

答案问为什么2不回答yes,指出了上述矛盾。

这么解释对吗?




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2