which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the “Report on Tourism” for the region must be in error in stating that   .

1. the average length of stay is longer at the largest hotel in Harristown than it is at the Royal Arms Hotel.

2. There is only one hotel in Harristown that is larger than the Royal Arms Hotel.

3. More tourists stay in hotels in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel.

4. The Royal Arms hotel is the largest hotel in Springfield

5. The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield.

 答案是B

可是我不懂啊,为什么是B呢，我觉得是E啊

两个地方S和H,一个号称S的游客多,一个号称H的最大的酒店的人比S的R多,问那个REPORT有什么错误,我觉得E的错误就很明显啊,S如果一共只有一个酒店的话那和上面说的明显矛盾啊

我这里的答案怎么是e?

我认为是B

both of these sources are accurate,如果H的酒店比S的酒店人多，那么S有不止一家酒店，才能合理解释S比H人多。

E选项中R是S的唯一酒店，把前提中的S比H人多给否定了