Board logo

标题: 求助:狒狒135的61题 [打印本页]

作者: Youcanmakeit    时间: 2008-1-3 06:39     标题: 求助:狒狒135的61题

61. Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new
 and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that 
reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August. 

 

Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?

 

A.        Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.

B.        Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August. 

C.        Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August. 

D.       Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were. 

E.        Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August. 
    答案是c       我选的是E.事故不是因为人为的错误引起的,那应该是因为机械的问题吧,怎么c反而说机械问题没那么多呢?
                       新的制度生效了,问题应该更容易被发现才对吧???  哪位牛人赐教一下,谢啦.

作者: thumbwings    时间: 2008-1-4 06:41

不妨取非,如果机械故障提高了50%,则机械故障报告的增多就并非“更严格的规则”,因而结论“That accounts for the fact that
reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.”不成立。呵呵,仅供参考哦

作者: Youcanmakeit    时间: 2008-1-4 20:23

啊?我觉得是更严格的规则出台,就把那些机械问题给检查报告出来了,才导致报告数量上升的.


作者: forgetviviva    时间: 2008-1-5 06:20

This question has several assumptions.

Logic structure: A does NOT lead to B, because C can lead to B.

Premise:  After crash in last August, new and more stringent rules was implented  => the increase of mechanical problems identified
Conclusion:
human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August
Assumption: There were at least as many mechanical problems as those before last August;
                     These (newly identified) mechanical problems are serious enough to cause crash by theirselves.

perhaps, even more assumptions can be listed.

作者: tayleerchen    时间: 2008-1-5 21:02

主要是第二和第三句的That accounts for引起本题的argument,对报告实施新规则限制是因为:笔者认为报告数量不同寻常的多了起来与实际情况不符,“实际情况”就是本argument 的假设,假设认为应该报告的实际情况确实没有现在已报告的这么多


作者: thumbwings    时间: 2008-1-6 06:37

假如实际上故障增加了100%而报告只增加了50%,说明报告不够严格.

正因为实际故障数量不变或者变化小于50%,才说明报告比过去严格了.






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2