Board logo

标题: (讨论) 一道逻辑题 [打印本页]

作者: dhhgh11    时间: 2004-3-23 14:40     标题: (讨论) 一道逻辑题


In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
Answer: (B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

What is this mean: ''...,but not voters who support the other candidate."?
难懂。望指教。fficeffice" />


作者: mary1    时间: 2004-3-23 14:46

What is this mean: ''...,but not voters who support the other candidate."?
就是说第三个党派不会拉走支持两大党派中某一派的选票。
答案你翻译一下就出来了,其他几个选项好象没有迷惑fficeffice" />


作者: sunnyrain    时间: 2004-3-23 16:14

...,but not voters who support the other candidate."?
就是说第三个党派不会拉走支持两大党派中某一派的选票。
真挺让人费解的





欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2