which of following challenges indicates the most serious weakeness in the attempted explanation described above?

(a)why does the part that replies not answer,"yes"?

(b)why are the observes facts in need of any special explanation?

(c)why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist'ssuggestion that they are deaf?

 (d)why do  hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?

(e)why are the  parts of the self the same for all subjects ?

这个题目的切入点在哪里

答案是Ａ　看不出削弱

我觉得这题就是常人思维吧

为了解释被催眠的人为什么听见说话还说没听见，理论家说这是由于接收器官和发送器相分离，照这样来说，接受器官应该不会对发送器官产生影响，那么人们的回答就不应该受到听觉的影响。但事实上，人们总是回答no，这说明其实接受器官和发送器官并不是分离的

我也没怎么明白这题到底什么意思，尽管看ＯＧ的解释觉得也挺有道理的，但总觉得不怎么清楚这其中的逻辑，我觉得原来的ａｒｇｕｍｅｎｔ我就没怎么明白！

另外，为什么Ｃ不对呢，ＯＧ说这是原文的假设，反正就是不明白。。。

请ＮＮ出来解释解释吧

这是让我感觉OG中最bullshit的一道题目：（

According to the explanation of some theorists, the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies. that is to say, the part that replies is not deaf.

However, when hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf, why they reply "No" but not "Yes"!!?? which is to say the part that replies is deaf.

So A......

I guess the logic behind is.... if the hearing is disconnected, the subject should answer "yes" because the reply part of the subject can hear.

This question a a little bull. It's like, the mouth should be able to hear. The logic being tested seems to me very different from the rest of the OG CR.

为什么D不行呢

请NN们讲一下，谢谢先..

个人认同rio多一些. 这里的 arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts ,and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.也就是说theorists 认为被心理暗示为聋了的人, 嘴巴是可以回答的.If so, people should be able to reply either yes or no. Not just answer as the implication from the hypnotice that they are deaf. So in fact, the people could hear.The mouth and ears are still sociated together.

I agree that both C and D are the supports for the conclusion of theorists.