GWD-30-Q22-Q25 拉丁美洲妇女从农村移到城市对其生活的影响
While acknowledging that
there are greater employment
opportunities for Latin Ameri-
Line can women in cities than in the
(5)
countryside, social science
theorists have continued to
argue that urban migration
has unequivocally hurt
women’s status. However,
(10)
the effects of migration are
more complex than these
theorists presume. For
example, effects can vary
depending on women’s
(15)
financial condition and social
class. Brazilian women in the
lowest socioeconomic class
have relatively greater job
opportunities and job security
(20)
in cities than do men of the
same class, although there is
no compelling evidence that
for these women the move to
the city is a move out of pov-
(25)
erty. Thus, these women
may improve their status in
relation to men but at the
same time may experience
no improvement in their
(30)
economic standing.
In addition, working out-
side the home, which is more
common in urban than in rural
areas, helps women in the
(35) lowest socioeconomic class
make contacts to extend
exchange networks—the flow
of gifts, loans, or child care
from those who currently
(40)
have access to resources
to those who do not. More-
over, poor women working in
urban areas actively seek to
cultivate long-term employer-
(45)
employee relations. When
an emergency arises that
requires greater resources
than an exchange network
can provide, these women
(50)
often appeal for and receive
aid from their wealthy employ-
ers. However, the structure
of many poor women’s
work—often a labor force
(55)
of one in an employer’s
home—makes it difficult for
them to organize to improve
their economic conditions in
general.
(60)
Not surprisingly, then,
Latin American women in the
lowest socioeconomic class
differ in their opinions about
the effects of urban migration
(65)
on their lives. Some find
urban living, with access to
electricity and running water,
an improvement and would
never return to the country-
(70)
side. Others, disliking the
overcrowding and crime,
would return to the country-
side if there were work
opportunities for them there.
(75)
Thus, urban life has had both
negative and positive impacts
on women’s lives. In gen-
eral, urban migration has not
provided economic pros-
perity or upward mobility for
women in the lowest socio-
economic class, despite their
intelligent and energetic utili-
zation of the resources
available to them.
两个原题为:Q22:
In the first paragraph, the author refers to the experiences of Brazilian women most probably in order to
A. A support an earlier assertion made by social science theorists about the effects of urban migration
B. B provide an example of one area in which urban migration has failed to improve Latin American women’s lives
C. C substantiate the claim that the effects of urban migration cannot be easily characterized
D. D illustrate the effect that urban migration has had on the economic status of Latin American women
E. E compare the effect that urban migration has had on the economic status of Latin American women with its effect on the economic status of Latin American men
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q24:
The author mentions which of the following as a disadvantage of urban employment for Latin American women in the lowest socioeconomic group?
A. It is difficult for these women to obtain reliable, long-term employment.
B. It is difficult for these women to organize effectively in order to obtain better wages.
C. It is difficult for these women to find employers who are supportive when emergencies arise.
D. The structure of their jobs makes it difficult for these women to participate in exchange networks.
E. Working in urban areas makes these women more vulnerable to health problems than they would be in rural areas.
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |