Board logo

标题: og11-47 [打印本页]

作者: sunnyfields    时间: 2007-8-22 07:08     标题: og11-47

Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)          Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.

(B)         Northern Power can choose from among various kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.

(C)         Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.

(D)         Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.

(E)         Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution.

答案是D, 题目中没有提到装scrubbers啊?怎么选项比较的是两者都有与只装scrubbers

  


作者: philikittists    时间: 2007-8-22 14:19

与单独装scrubbers相比,两个都装上不会减少更多的有害气体。

因此,只用scrubber就足够了。


作者: missdandan    时间: 2007-8-23 06:49

作假设题,有一种方法,就是把选项去掉not,看是否是对原结论的削弱,如果是,那么就是正确的假设,假设是必要条件,而非充分条件。此题去掉not,就是两个方法和起来更有效,是对原结论的削弱.




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2