国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: GWD29-14 [打印本页]

作者: sheeper2008 时间: 2007-8-19 07:22 标题: GWD29-14

Q14:

In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.

arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

Answer: E

我选A

我的问题是:treatise可以自己argue吗?

觉得逻辑意思不对啊?

A哪里错了内

作者: tongxiao88 时间: 2007-8-19 19:35

treatise是论著的意思，这种类型的句子优选出现新名词同位语的选项；然后，argue for是主张、赞成的意思，不一定需要人做施动者；A错在arguing修饰人，还是修饰那篇论文，不清楚，不如同位语结构好；A还错在两个for不平行。

作者: SunnyApples 时间: 2007-8-20 06:52

i pick B,

in E, i don't think that "argued for" is a correct tense here, because the past tense means that the action "argue" only occured one time in the past, rather than many times.

so, the expression in E seems to distort the original meaning of the sentence.

would somebody tell me what's wrong in B ?

thx...

作者: lxj19820127 时间: 2007-8-21 14:16

考点：同位语修饰；平行；

正确答案E，就不分析，我想分析下：B 为什么错？

因为前面Discourse on Women 已经是a treatise，LM 发表了一部著作，在一部著作中LM呼吁。。。。。。给人感觉逻辑含义有问题。

如果将B中的a treatise 改成 the treatise 是否就正确呢？如下：

In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in the treatise for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes in the married women’s property laws.

LM 发表了一部著作，在该部著作中LM呼吁。。。。。。

请NN解答，非常感谢。

作者: lewis 时间: 2007-8-22 06:41

QUOTE:

B 为什么错？

B. arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women

B has two problems:

1) arguing 指代不明，

2） a treatise 指代不明

作者: sheeper2008 时间: 2007-8-25 18:55

many  thanks  !!!!!!

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)