也不知道是不是在其他套的题里面，刚刚找这题的讨论没有找到，请大家帮帮忙，帮忙分析一下好么？

Q39:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below? 

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown.  A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield.  If both of these sources are accurate, however, the “Report on Tourism” for the region must be in error in stating that ______.

1. the average length of stay is longer at the largest hotel in Harristown than it is at the Royal Arms Hotel
2. there is only one hotel in Harristown that is larger than the Royal Arms Hotel
3. more tourists stay in hotels in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel
4. the Royal Arms Hotel is the largest hotel in Springfield
5. the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield

   Answer: E

I think the idea is to ensure both claims are wrong, that are

1, more people go to Springfield

2, more people on largest hotel in Harristown than Royal Arms Hotel

only answer E exisits. That is to say, Royal Arms Hotel is definitely not the only hotel in Springfield, otherwise where does the exceeding number of tourists stay in Sprinfield?

A, has never stated in the claim

B, has never stated in the claim

C, is actually a correct conclusion drawn from the claim

D, has never stated in the claim