国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: 争议题：GWD17-Q14 [打印本页]

作者: jessicafairy 时间: 2007-6-7 07:06 标题: 争议题：GWD17-Q14

争议题，参考答案给的B，个人意见倾向A，请大家拍砖

Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next.

Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry[MSOffice1] they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete[MSOffice2]
Although the lines of competition are clearly defined in industries that are more established[MSOffice3] , they are blurred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as competing companies
The lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, unlike the Internet where they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete
Unlike more established industries, where the lines of competition are clearly defined, they are burred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as companies that compete
Unlike more established industries, with clearly defined lines of competition, those of the Internet industry are blurred and indistinct, as competing companies

Answer:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[MSOffice1]位置虽然不见得好，但是也不见得不好

[MSOffice2]companies that compete one day may be partners the next , 明显更balance, 如果用competing companies会造成one day的修饰比较尴尬，

[MSOffice3]这个用法上明显是不如more established的，同等条件下adj.>clause, and “in the more established industries” is more parallel to “in the Internet industry”

作者: xiaoxiaoqing 时间: 2007-6-7 14:27

 more+adj+n,你说这个more 修饰谁呢，是adj 还是n？所以有歧义，比如：more effecient small cars应该改为：small cars that are more efficient.

作者: jessicafairy 时间: 2007-6-8 06:43

谢谢楼上的回答,

这个我也看到讨论帖说过这个问题,难道说所有的用more的比较级都不能修

饰可数名词?这个恐怕不能作为标准吧

但是再看B,competing这个词在句子中明显就破坏了句子的平衡,而且,one

day修饰什么呢?

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)