Mayor Delmont's critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont's leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont's tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the ad?
1.) the average pay for jobs created in the city during the past 3 years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont's tenure
2.) average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
3.) some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont's tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again
4.) the average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont's tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide
5.) the average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city 答案是4 为什么不是2呢/ 作者: veronica845 时间: 2007-5-23 20:35
应强调失业部分的平均工资与其他部分的相对关系，若失业部分平均工资<=平均水平则原文结论成立。
2说的是整体工资水平状况，无关。
作者: jessicafairy 时间: 2007-5-27 19:58
谢谢你哟 !!!!
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
