16. Advertiser: The revenue that newspapers and magazines earn by publishing advertisements allows publishers to keep the prices per copy of their publications much lower than would otherwise be possible. Therefore, consumers benefit economically from advertising.
Consumer: But who pays for the advertising that pays for low-priced newspapers and magazines? We consumers do, because advertisers pass along advertising costs to us through the higher prices they charge for their products.
Which of the following best describes how the consumer counters the advertiser’s argument?
(A) By alleging something that, if true, would weaken the plausibility of the advertiser’s conclusion
(B) By questioning the truth of the purportedly factual statement on which the advertiser’s conclusion is based
(C) By offering an interpretation of the advertiser’s opening statement that, if accurate, shows that there is an implicit contradiction in it
(D) By pointing out that the advertiser’s point of view is biased（A）
(E) By arguing that the advertiser too narrowly restricts the discussion to the effects of advertising that are economic
答案是A,我觉得太直接了,题目问消费者如何反驳广告商的言论,答案的意思是消费者说广告商的结论不可信.我觉得就是重复了问题,换了一个说法而已
答案是A,我觉得太直接了,题目问消费者如何反驳广告商的言论,答案的意思是消费者说广告商的结论不可信.我觉得就是重复了问题,换了一个说法而已
E对么? 消费者从另外的角度说明了广告的经济方面的影响,而广告商仅仅从报纸价格的角度说明广告的经济方面的影响,跟E的意思差不多吧
E对么? 消费者从另外的角度说明了广告的经济方面的影响,而广告商仅仅从报纸价格的角度说明广告的经济方面的影响,跟E的意思差不多吧
A没有仅仅重复问题啊,消费者的确是通过另一个角度的分析(by alleging something)削弱广告商的结论。
E说消费者说广告商仅仅把讨论局限在广告的经济效应上。题目没有这个意思啊,虽然双方分析的角度不同,但都是围绕着广告造成的经济效应(减少消费者购买报纸杂志的成本,却提高了消费者购买商品的成本)。
广告者：我们降低了每本杂志的价钱，所以消费者是广告的受益者消费者：谁为这些广告买单呢？消费者，因为广告者会把商品的价格提的很高，来收回广告成本。（消费者是受害者）
广告者：我们降低了每本杂志的价钱，所以消费者是广告的受益者消费者：谁为这些广告买单呢？消费者，因为广告者会把商品的价格提的很高，来收回广告成本。（消费者是受害者）
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |