In the course of her research, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3,1739, is a a record of Schnitzler&s arrest for peddling without a liscense. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has benn pedding off and on for 20 years.

The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?

A) Schnitzler started pedding around 1719.

B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for pedding.

C) The undated document was written before 1765.

D) The arrest record was written after the undated document.

E) The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.

答案解释是C. 但是解释内容有些牛头不对马嘴。说可以推断出第二份资料应写在1759年之前，所以C对。

我怀疑是不是印的时候少了原题的内容。个人以为要推也只可能是A。因为statement是在arrest以后才发表的。

请看见过这题的XDJM或nn指点。

sorry, still could not understand. why is before 1765?

从提干得出可能性有两种，其一，1739ES年被逮捕的时间点是他刚开始pedding,这样的话，因为ES已经断断续续干了20年，那么未注明日期的说明应该是after 1759年写的。

其二，1739年ES被逮捕的时间点是他最后作pedding.因为断断续续所以没被抓到过。所以ES从1719年开始pedding的。

但是无论如何和1765年扯不上干系啊！

麻烦楼主再说说。

你用的是陈向东的哪本书,可不可以帮我解答一题,也是陈向东书里的.

3. Some people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials if the judge and jury can be persuaded that the asserting officer was not aware of violating or did not intend to violate the law while seizing the evidence. This proposed “good-faith exception” would weaken everyone’s constitutional protection, lead to less careful police practices, and promote lying by law enforcement officer in court.

The argument above for maintaining the prohibition against illegally obtained evidence assumes that

a.      defendants in criminal cases should enjoy greater protection from the law than other citizens do.

b.     Law enforcement authorities need to pursue criminals assiduously.

c.     The legal system will usually find ways to ensure that real crimes do not go unprosecuted.

d.     The prohibition now deters some unlawful searches and seizures.

e.      Courts should consider the motives of law enforcement officers in deciding whether evidence brought forward by the officers is admissible in a trial.

能说说原因么 另外e错误的原因 谢谢