Board logo

标题: GWD-2-11 [打印本页]

作者: tigerszheng    时间: 2007-2-12 07:05     标题: GWD-2-11

GWD-2-11

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are

commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several wine

makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to

drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers

without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites. Which of the following is an assumption

on which the argument depends?

A. These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced

by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic

substances to their wine.

B. Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C. Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D. Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give

rise to an allergic reaction.

E. Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in

amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines

题目中there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce是什么意思?

是说把sulfites加到没有含sulfites的酒中去吗?如若是这样,酒中不是又含有sulfites了吗,人不是又要过敏了吗?

不是很明白,请指教!


作者: zhangxirui02    时间: 2007-2-13 12:39

我选E。

there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they

produce的意思是说有几个WINE MAKERS并没在他们的酒里加S这个东西。






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2