返回列表 发帖

一道GWD逻辑题,想不明白,求NN指点哪~

GWD6-Q14:

Political Advertisement:

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.  So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.

D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.

E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
原文是说:相比被减少的工作,更多的工作被创造,这些新工作的平均工资高于城市平均工资水平。所以在D任期内,平均工资的支付支票会稳步上升。
要证明支付的工资会越来越多

答案是D。A为什么不能增强呢?
谢谢啦。。。

收藏 分享

我的理解是    平均工资由 增加的工资水平和减少的工资水平共同决定 average payback=created job amount*average pay for created job — eliminated job amount* average pay for eliminated job 文中是支持减号前面的内容   所以D说 减少的工资水平和以往相比是一样的 排除了减号后面的内容影响。 所以整体水平上升。
选项A 就是重述原文 加强减号前面的内容   如果eliminated job 占据大部分工资水平  那么 总水平就会下降 ………………

感觉说得好复杂 ……

TOP