og12-38

lisney

有道题想请教，谢谢啦
In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on
Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the
married women’s property laws.
(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal
rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women’s equal political
and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women’s equal political
and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and
legal rights for women
Parallelism; Rhetorical construction
Mott’s Discourse was a treatise, and it is redundant
and confusing to present her as both publishing
her Discourse and arguing in a treatise, as though
they were two separate things. Th e verb arguing
must be followed by a prepositional phrase
beginning with for, but the verb advocating simply
takes a direct object.
A After published her Discourse … arguing in a
treatise is wordy and imprecise.
B Arguing in a treatise is redundant and
awkward.
C Th e verb advocates does not work
idiomatically with the prepositional phrase
for changes. …
D Th e verbal advocating does not work
idiomatically with the prepositional phrase
for changes. …
E Correct. Th e title of Mott’s publication is
followed by a phrase describing the treatise,
and argued is followed by for.
Th e correct answer is E

STshadow

Discourse on Women  是一本书  a treatise是它的同位语  所以AB排除
CDE中 ADVOCATE这个动词和原句中的ARGU不同  而且不能和FOR 搭配  所以选E

lisney

谢谢了

Jackjokes

我觉得，AB错的地方在于
-ing分词形式的短语，是有两种功能的：一是表伴随动作、状态、功能，与句子谓语动作同时发生，逻辑主语等与句子主语
                                         二是表伴随结果，整个句子是原因，导致分词动作产生，无逻辑主语。
显然AB都不是这种用法所以不好。

C D我判断错的根据是，未划线部分是and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
所以前面应该有for和他平行，而C D没有，所以选择E

liuqiangde

LZ，不知道你的具体问题是什么，但我觉得OG的解释应该很到位了，仔细研究一下应该也够了。