返回列表 发帖

[求助]LSAT-1-5-18

18.   If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?


(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.


(B) Harming the environment is not an end, or purpose, of the arts of life.


(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.


(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.”(E)


(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.


答案E 读了半天提干也不明白作者是在支持“应该nature”还是“arts of life比nature好”呢?以前没遇到过这样的题型,这中题究竟该找什么突破口呢?
收藏 分享

这个题目不是要weaken而是response似乎做法不太一样,要结合文章来看的.从E看,response是承认了损害,但是强调这样的损害是对人类有好处的,还是说明art of life还是有好处的.楼主要是考GMAT的话,不必要太强求这个题目,GMAT里没有类似的题目的.
把所有的困苦都看做是有意义的,是生命对你的磨练,也许,是为了让你成大事而做准备。

TOP

我觉得作者是在支持arts of life比nature好,题目要找出削弱建房不利于环境这个观点。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看