返回列表 发帖

请教LSAT一道?

14. Pamela: Physicians training for a medical specialty serve as resident staff physicians in hospitals. They work such long hours – up to 36 consecutive hours – that fatigue impairs their ability to make the best medical decisions during the final portion of their shifts.

Quincy: Thousands of physicians now practicing have been trained according to the same regimen, and records show they generally made good medical decisions during their training periods. Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?

Which one of the following, if true, is the most effective counter Pamela might make to Quincy’s argument?

(A) The basic responsibilities of resident staff physicians in hospitals have not changed substantially over the past few decades.

(B) Because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stay than in the past.

(C) It is important that emergency-room patients receive continuity of physician care, insofar as possible, over the critical period after admission, generally 24 hours.

(D) The load of work on resident physicians-in-training varies according to the medical specialty for which each is being trained.

(E) The training of physicians should include observation and recognition of the signs indicating a hospitalized patient’s progress or decline over a period of at least 36 hours.
answer :B
why? thanks!
收藏 分享

题目实际要求选择weaken Q的选项。
用排除法,A有支持的嫌疑,C也有支持的嫌疑,D无关,E比C更是支持。
笨了点,但估计实战中看不懂B也只能这样啦。

TOP

看明白了,注意Q的最后一句话是Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?
Q认为过去行的现在没有理由改,选项B指出事异时移,病人的难度增加了,可能传统方法不再奏效,自然就是weaken啦。
看来看题还是很关键。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看