返回列表 发帖

求助费费131!!

131. To become an expert on a musical instrument, a person must practice. If a person practice a musical instrument for three hours each day, they will eventually become expert on that instrument. Therefore, if a person is an expert on a musical instrument, that person must have practiced for at least three hours each day.

 

 

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning above?

 

 

A.        The conclusion fails to take into account that people who practice for three hours every day might not yet have reached a degree of proficiency that everyone would consider expert.

B.        The conclusion fails to take into account that practicing for less than three hours each day may be enough for some people to become experts.

C.        the conclusion fails to take into account that if a person has not practiced for at least three hours a day, the person has not become an expert.

D.       The conclusion fails to take into account that three consecutive hours of daily practice is not recommended by all music teachers.

E.        The conclusion fails to take into account that few people have the spare time necessary to devote three hours daily to practice.

答案是B,求NN给一下思路,谢谢拉!!

收藏 分享

归纳性的推理是由个别性的前提推到一般性的结论,其结论是或然性的

所以说有些人一天练3小时可以成为专家,有些人可能只用一小时也足以成为专家。选B

TOP

就是说三个小时非充分必要条件。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看