data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59eb1/59eb17213dd83ed84af083b0f5d40a86c7bf51e2" alt="Rank: 2"
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 70
- 经验
- 70 点
- 威望
- 0 点
- 金钱
- 132 ¥
- 魅力
- 70
|
One more RC to add.
It's about 45 lines. Talking about problems encounted in studying genes. Main problem is different fields have different scope of defining the same concept. One field defines one term ("adaptive gene?", don't remember the term exactly) broadly, the other field's definition is more narrow -- they only consider a gene mutuation adaptive if it keeps the animal healthy. Then give an example to note the difference. Some fruitfly's gene mutated so that they shake while flying. The first field considers this an adaptive gene, but the other doesnot consider it is even worth studying. |
|