返回列表 发帖

GWD28-19

Plankton generally thrive in areas of the ocean with sufficient concentrations of certain nitrogen compounds near the surface where plankton live. Nevertheless, some areas, though rich in these nitrogen compounds, have few plankton. These areas have particularly low concentrations of iron, and oceanographers hypothesize that this shortage of iron prevents plankton from thriving. However, an experimental release of iron compounds into one such area failed to produce a thriving plankton population, even though local iron concentrations increased immediately.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, argues most strongly against concluding, on the basis of the information above, that the oceanographers’ hypothesis is false?

A: Not all of the nitrogen compounds that are sometimes found in relatively high concentrations in the oceans are nutrients for plankton.

B: Certain areas of the ocean support an abundance of plankton despite having particularly low concentrations of iron.

C: The release of the iron compounds did not increase the supply of nitrogen compounds in the area.

D: A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the iron-rich water from the surface.

E: The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean where plankton thrive.

答案为D 分不清DE什么区别啊~  NN帮忙解释一下

收藏 分享

海洋学家的假设:没有铁浮游生物活不下去

原文的反对:我放点铁进去浮游生物还是活不下去,因此有了铁浮游生物还是活不下去。

反对原文的反对:放进去的铁都被洋流吹走了。(D)

E说的是放进去的这些铁在浮游生物活得很好的地方自然的出现。说明不了任何问题啊。

TOP

i see, thanks !!!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看