返回列表 发帖

GWD6-Q40

GWD6-Q40:

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite.  However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.  So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

 

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

 

  1. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars.
  2. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth.
  3. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
  4. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
  5. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

Why D? Thanks.

收藏 分享

想像一下,一堆孩子中搞滴血认亲,找了半天说这里任何两个孩子的学都可以溶,所以这些孩子里没有外地人留下的。殊不知,这些孩子都是外地人的娃.

TOP

thanks !!!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看