返回列表 发帖

请教gwd-8-27

Q27:

Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.  Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.  However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
  2. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
  3. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
  4. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
  5. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

答案是C,可是我越看C越像加强!

收藏 分享

文中认为上课使得犯罪减少了,所以不许罪犯上课是不对的。C说的是那些上课的罪犯在没上课之前不会更容易犯罪。把C取非,说那些上课的罪犯在上课之前本来就不容易犯罪,也就是说上课没用,这样weaken了文中结论。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看