返回列表 发帖

[求助]11OG-153

153. Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar

energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold

of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise

in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is

unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency

of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.

(B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased

raw material costs for that equipment.

(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.

(D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.

(E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become

economically viable.

ANSWER:C

WHY??

收藏 分享

A  this question was discussed yesterday or two days ago. please check for it.
A1 it was under og10, but I forgot the #. sorry about that.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看