Q14:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
- The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
- Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
- Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
- The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
- The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
答案是C.我理解为可能是说实际上减少的工作没有那么多,有些是新增又减掉的,但这个意思在第二句里已经表达了,说新增的工作比减掉的多.我觉得D好象也有道理啊,减掉的工作所付的工资是平均水平而不是高工资的工作,才可以保证整个城市的平均工资水平上涨.是否我理解有误?请大家指教,谢谢! [em11] | 
