Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
- Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
- Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
- The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
- The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
- The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
这题看上去象是要考not only... but also,但我看实际上不该用not only ... but also, 因为逻辑意思上讲不同. 前半部分说系统性的砍伐树木为人民带来的大量的可耕种农田地和便宜的家具和房屋造价,后面说那样却导致了水土流失和地区性的快速沙漠化...只用but also来转折好象比较好.所以我选D,而给出的答案是A. 各位怎么看.
| 
