返回列表 发帖

请问GWD26-29

Q29

Educational Theorist: Recent editorials have called for limits on the amount

of homework assigned to children. They point out that free-time activities

play an important role in childhood development and that large amounts of

homework reduce children’s free time, hindering their development. But the

average homework time for a ten year old, for example, is little more than

30 minutes per night. Clearly, therefore, there is no need to impose the

limits these editorials are calling for.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the educational theorist’s

argument relies?

A. The free-time activities that ten year olds engage in most are all

approximately equally effective at fostering development

B. Regularly doing homework assignments improves children’s academic

performance.

C. Individual teachers are not the best judges of how much homework to

assign the children they teach

D. In most schools, if not all, the homework assignments given are of a

length that does not diverge widely from the average.

E. Free-time activities rarely teach children skills or information that they

can use in their academic work.答案是D,能否赐教?我个人觉得是B

收藏 分享

B weakens the argument (less homework => better)
D is important because the argument won't stand if the average = 30mins but some schools assign, for example, 3 hours of homework. In that case, an upper limit will be helpful.

TOP

我选D

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看