返回列表 发帖

求助GWD15-38

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

  1. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
  2. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
  3. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
  4. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
  5. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard

我选的答案是D,正确答案是E,主要是不懂这题是什么意思.请牛人赐教

[em15][em06]
收藏 分享

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看