返回列表 发帖

大全-3-20

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.


Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?


(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.


(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.


(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.


(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.E


(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

:(,这个题目的问题部分没看懂。请教大牛给翻译一下并说明答案为什么是E?

收藏 分享

呵呵,这题你自己举个例子嘛
a同意以前必须知道还有谁被提名(这个人自己也要同意这种提名)
可是那个b呢在自己同意以前又要知道a是否同意这种提名,呵呵,这还搞的好啊
结果就是这种政策根本就没法施行

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看