返回列表 发帖

[求助]GWD17-13

Q13:

Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:

Krenland’s steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland’s steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

  1. Because steel from Krenland is rarely competitive in international markets, only a very small portion of Krenlandian steelmakers’ revenue comes from exports.
  2. The international treaties that some governments are violating by giving subsidies to steelmakers do not specify any penalties for such violations.
  3. For many Krenlandian manufacturers who face severe international competition in both domestic and export markets, steel constitutes a significant part of their raw material costs.
  4. Because of advances in order-taking, shipping, and inventory systems, the cost of shipping steel from foreign producers to Krenland has fallen considerably in recent years.
  5. Wages paid to workers in the steel industry in Krenland differ significantly from wages paid to workers in many of the countries that export steel to Krenland.
收藏 分享

c

TOP

谁能解释一下为什么选C啊?

TOP

注意题干中的wahtever the cause, 而实际上DE都是在解释这个cause,试想原推导关系可以忽略却不影响原推导关系的动动怎么可能去削弱原推导关系呢。

题干推导关系为:

廉价进口铁----影响本地铁人工作-----政府不但应该保护铁工业,还应保护铁人就业。

C说铁工业中的成本的很大一块是原材料, 不是政府想管就管的了的。 构成削弱

本题削弱原推导关系的推论

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看