|
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 119
- 经验
- 119 点
- 威望
- 0 点
- 金钱
- 241 ￥
- 魅力
- 148
|
my argument model...
In the argument the arguer asserts that …, in order to substantiate the argument, the arguer here provides the evidence that …, and that … It appears to be somewhat appealing, however, its weakness is that it does incorporate all necessary evidence to support the conclusion what the arguer claims. It is based on doubtful assumptions and problematic fallacies.
In the first place, the argument relies on wrong casual assumption that A caused B. It is a typical fallacy of “After this and, Therefore because of this”. The arguer has never established any casual relationship between A and B. The mere fact that A coincide with B does not necessarily prove the arguer’s assumption that A caused B. Many other factors, such as … could bring about the same results. Unless the arguer can provide sound evidence to demonstrate that it was A that solely account for B, the argument is problematic.
Secondly, the arguer here offers insufficient evidence supporting the argument. One example is rarely enough to draw a general conclusion. The arguer must show A1 is representative of A, otherwise, there is no reason to believe the data draw from a certain region (field) is warrant to represent the whole areas because it is possible that…
Thirdly, the argument is based on a false analogy. It may be true that certain similar aspects do exist, but the striking disparities between A and B should be the first focus as far as the issue is concerned. For instance, A …, however, B … Thus the assertion is too presumptuous to be accepted.
Fourthly, the arguer groundless assumes that all things are equal. The fact that happened X years is not a plausible evidence to draw the conclusion that…(or change it into the similar things mentioned in the argument as the evidence). At the same time, the arguer fails to show us whether the conditions related changes or not. For example, given that …,. It is unlikely that … It is rootless to say that…
Fifthly, the argument mentions that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives. However, common sense tells us that things can be succeeded by doing both. For example, … It is obvious that the argument is invalid.
Sixthly, the arguer fails to take into account necessary information concerning the sample and the procedure of the survey, such as who, when, where and how the research is conducted. It is too vague to be reliable, unless we get the exact answers of these questions the argument would be worthless as evidence for… for example, if 2000 people were surveyed, but only 20 responded, how could we get the conclusion just according to the result from such little proportion? The conclusion that … would be highly suspect.
Finally, the arguer unfairly presupposes that A is necessary to B. No evidence in the argument is stated to support the assumption. Perhaps that …, however, it is more likely that … (opposite). Therefore, the argument is unconvincing without ruling out such possibility.
Consequently, the arguer’s conclusion lacks incredibility because evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To make the argument more convincing and effective, the arguer need provide more substantial fact that…
actually, we only need choose three of them according to the certain argument, however, you need prepare your own example to support your view of point.
about the issue, i advocate three basic things:
1, present your view of piont directly and concisely
2. make each subview a paragraph and support it by at least an example
3. in your final paragraph restate your view of point and if you have enough time just mention your several reasons again to make your issue longer.
I dont advocate the use of model in the wring of issue, for the basic ground of issue is to build something you think necessary, just present yourself about the issue, otherwise your presentation will be too rigid.
After my review of the model of zoeboy, i should say, it has so much influence of Mr.sun yuan.
Actually i disagree with the method used by Mr. sun, his expression commits a very important wrong way as defined by ets, too awkward
But to many students who have no working experience, suggest reading more and more, otherwise your issue will appear to be dull, no content.
anyway, my personal onion is for issue, you just need build your view of point and then try to support it in your own way. |
|
