返回列表 发帖

GWD18-3

Q3 to Q5:

The idea that equipping homes

with electrical appliances and other

“modern” household technologies

Line would eliminate drudgery, save labor

(5) time, and increase leisure for women

who were full-time home workers

remained largely unchallenged until

the women’s movement of the 1970’s

spawned the groundbreaking and

(10) influential works of sociologist Joann

Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan.

Vanek analyzed 40 years of time-

use surveys conducted by home

economists to argue that electrical

(15) appliances and other modern house-

hold technologies reduced the effort

required to perform specific tasks,

but ownership of these appliances did

not correlate with less time spent on

(20) housework by full-time home workers.

In fact, time spent by these workers

remained remarkably constant―at

about 52 to 54 hours per week―from

the 1920’s to the 1960’s, a period

(25) of significant change in household

technology. In surveying two

centuries of household technology

in the United States, Cowan argued

that the “industrialization” of the home

(30) often resulted in more work for full-time

home workers because the use of

such devices as coal stoves, water

pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended

to reduce the workload of married-

(35) women’s helpers (husbands, sons,

daughters, and servants) while

promoting a more rigorous standard

of housework. The full-time home

worker’s duties also shifted to include

(40) more household management, child

care, and the post-Second World War

phenomenon of being “Mom’s taxi.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q3:

According to the passage, which of the following is true about the idea mentioned in line 1?

  1. It has been undermined by data found in time-use surveys conducted by home economists.
  2. It was based on a definition of housework that was explicitly rejected by Vanek and Cowan.
  3. It is more valid for the time period studied by Cowan than for the time period studied by Vanek.
  4. It is based on an underestimation of the time that married women spent on housework prior to the industrialization of the household.
  5. It inaccurately suggested that new household technologies would reduce the effort required to perform housework.

Answer:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q4:

The passage is primarily concerned with

  1. analyzing a debate between two scholars
  2. challenging the evidence on which a new theory is based
  3. describing how certain scholars’ work countered a prevailing view
  4. presenting the research used to support a traditional theory
  5. evaluating the methodology used to study a particular issue

Answer:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:

Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 21-26 (“In fact, time … in household technology”)?

  1. It offers an alternative interpretation of a phenomenon described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20).
  2. It provides the specific evidence on which an argument described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20) is based.
  3. It shifts the focus of the argument developed earlier in the passage.
  4. It introduces evidence that has not been taken into account by Vanek and Cowan.
  5. It introduces a topic for discussion that will be developed in the rest of the passage.

请问第三题中A,E哪一个比较好?

收藏 分享

A

analyzed 40 years of time-

use surveys conducted by home

economists to argue that electrical

(15) appliances and other modern house-

hold technologies reduced the effort

required to perform specific tasks,

but ownership of these appliances did

not correlate with less time spent on

(20) housework by full-time home workers.

In fact, time spent by these workers

remained remarkably constant

TOP

E为什么不行?

TOP

第三题,reduce the effort of housework 是对的,在第15行开始,反对的意见是没有reduce the time of house work 但是的确reduced the effort of the house work . so E It inaccurately suggested that new household technologies would reduce the effort required to perform housework 是不对的

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看