返回列表 发帖

Prep2012-Pack1-CR-059求解释!!

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the president's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the president's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?
A. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the president to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
B. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the president's party.
C. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
D. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the president's party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
E. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.
答案选B,但是完全看不懂解释!
收藏 分享

题目
前提是,公平的auditor测算出是浪费的项目,总统才决定取消。
结论是,总统在决定是否取消铁路项目中是公平的,不受政党政治影响的。
B选项,大意说,政府取消的在建项目,大多数不是在总统所在党派的地区。
试想,B取反,如果总统所在党派的地区,有很多铁路项目都取消了。反对
党就没理由批评总统了,因为总统大义灭亲。这时就不需要把auditor搬出
来了。
正是因为总统派的项目没取消,反对派的地区的项目取消了,反对党才拿
来说事儿的。

TOP

这道题我也郁闷好久,然后在国外论坛上搜索,明白了一些。
把国外的instructor解释贴上来
The press secretary says that the report labeled the canceled
projects as wasteful, but doesn't make any mention of how the
report labeled the non-canceled projects.
For example, if the report identified a total of 200 wasteful
projects, 90 in opposing party districts and 110 in his own party
districts, and the president cancelled all 90 of the opposing and
only 10 of his own, then there would be a strong case for bias.

B意思是这个报告里的identified出来的浪费钱的项目大多数都不在总统政
党的辖区内。
所以有90%在反对党的辖区是正常的。

因为如果report标注的浪费钱的项目大多数都在总统政党的辖区内,而取
消的大多数在反对党的辖区,那么说明总统在选择取消项目上是有偏见的。

TOP

谢谢~明白了~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看