一道prep的题目~~临近考试了却发现自己做逻辑的思路好像有点问题了
Kitchen magazine plans to license the use of its name by a line of cookware. For a magazine, licensing the use of its name for products involves some danger, since if the products disappoint consumers, the magazine's reputation suffers, with consequent reductions in circulation and advertising. However, experts have evaluated the cookware and found it superior to all other cookware advertised in Kitchen. Therefore, Kitchen can collect its licensing fee without endangering its other revenues.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
A. No other line of cookware is superior to that which will carry the Kitchen name.
B. Kitchen will not license the use of its name for any products other than the line of cookware.
C. Makers of cookware will not find Kitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine's name is associated with a competing product.
D. Consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine will be attracted to the cookware by the Kitchen name.
E. Kitchen is one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines.
正确答案是C
文中的结论是这本杂志可以收取license fee并且不会损害到它的收入。
原因是专家发现kitchen要命名的cookware比其他在kitchen上做广告的质量要好,所以不会使消费者失望而影响到它的收入。
我想专家只是和在kitchen上做过广告的cookware比较,没有和别的产品比较啊,所以选了A。
能不能帮我解释下是为什么呀?还有我的想法哪里错了? |