- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1350
- 经验
- 1350 点
- 威望
- 134 点
- 金钱
- 134 ¥
- 魅力
- 134
|
46. Archaeologists in Michigan have excavated a Native American camp near Dumaw Creek. Radiocarbon dating of animal bones found at the site indicates that the camp dates from some time between 1605 and 1755. However, the camp probably dates to no later than 1630, since no European trade goods were found at the site, and European traders were active in the region from the 1620's onward.
考古学家在密歇根发现了一处遗址,根据激光显示这处遗址应该在1605到1755期间。但是实际上应该不晚于1630,因为在遗址中没有发现欧洲的交易品,并且欧洲交易在1630以后才发生在这一区域。
没有欧洲交易品推出不晚于1630
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Due to trade among Native Americans, some European trade goods would have reached the area before the European traders themselves did.
和这个区域并没直接的关系
(B) At all camps in the region that have been reliably dated to the late 1620's, remains of European trade goods have been found.
正确,在1620年后的遗址中,欧洲商品就出现了。属于异因异果。
(C) The first European trade goods to reach the area would have been considered especially valuable and preserved as much as possible from loss or destruction.
和欧洲商品的价值无关,和遗址没有关系
(D) The first European traders in the area followed soon after the first European explorers.
和欧洲商人什么时候进入无关
(E) The site is that of a temporary camp that would have been used seasonally for a few years and then abandoned.
并不能加强1620这个年代 |
|