GWD2-Q10

callmesoli

Environmentalist:  The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville create sun acceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.
Milville business spokesperson:  Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville  in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents.  So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.
Environmentalist: I disagree:  A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.
Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?

A.    Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
B.    Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
C.    Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
D.    Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist’s position in order to be better able to attack it
E.    Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people




选E，请问B为什么不对？

instinctwu

顶。我也困惑~~~~我觉得B不错。如果是我选的话

FindNeverland

顶，虽然在BE之间徘徊后选了E,但仍想不清楚B选项

cindytaurus

我也选的B。。。。郁闷中~~~
谁来解答下哦~~~~

aduoyi

B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome

assumption的内容是优点（brings many out-of-towners ）被产生优点的缺点(use of snowmobiles)超过了(因为如果没有use of snowmobile人会更多）。这就是Environmentalist的观点。而challenge这个观点则又与Environmentalist的观点相反。
所以B错了。

ashleych

E翻译出来就是：发言人表达会给一部分人受益，但是环保学者否认能够真

正给这些人带来收益。