返回列表 发帖

关于sdcar2010的逻辑总结运用问题—OG上BF类题目分析

看了sdcar2010的帖子,写的真的很精彩。我看完一章再总结OG上的题目,今天看到BF。被一道OG题目困惑了,冒昧请求您帮忙解答一下。
79. In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in
automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in
countries where whiplash is not covered.
Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that
spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the
conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash
injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly,
in countries where automobile insurance does not
include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that
they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.
(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is
that conclusion.
(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further
evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
(D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in
order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding. Answer-[D]
(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to
establish that the finding is accurate
.

这题中,conclusion是什么?按照OG的解释,clearly后面的是推翻前面的解释。但我觉得把它看成main conclusion也行啊?前面的当成所有原因。能帮忙分析下吗?真的十分感谢。

我能通过第一个黑体排除A,B。然后认为claim和conclusion在这里是一样的,所以在C、D里选答案。可是也觉得第一个黑体是一个finding,那么应该也是一个evidence啊。前面你也说了evidence可以是一个observations等等,我觉得这个finding也就是evidence.

那么到底是第二个黑体是不是结论的问题,还是第一个黑体是evidence或finding的问题呢?
收藏 分享

C不错在第一个evidence,只是后面的for which the argument provides further evidence, 这里并没有给出进一步的证据。(所谓证据就是事实,这里后面根本没有,都是写文章的人主观的说法,即都是一些概念,并非用事实,证据来解释)我认为,第二个黑体,当然也是main conclusion,但是因为C中的前面半句不对只能舍弃。 因为一个东西作为main conclusion,他的确还可以有其他作用,不需要一定要体现他main conclusion, 比方雷锋是好人,那么不仅他是好人,他还是男人。 不能被一点套牢。看选项D,的确反驳了一些评论家的评论(一半的”W"是有疑问的”多总结,多想,不用去怀疑正确选项,但是从正确选项来分析,然后把自己的思路弄得和正选一样,就好了,路漫长的,也蛮累的,加油

TOP

我觉得第二个黑体当结论有点牵强了,我觉得“所以,之前的解释是错的”这种带有主观感情色彩(啊啊啊 不知道该怎么表达,反正大概就是这个意思)的话更应该当做结论吧。。。第二个黑体明显还是在cite一些个客观存在,作者并没有进一步得出神马结论,哦哦不知道你看懂没。。。
关于finding是不是evidence的问题,首先看看finding在科林斯字典里的解释:someone‘s findings are the information they get or the conclusions they come to as the result of an investigation or some research.调查结果或者是研究结论,所以finding是不是conclusion不能一概而论。我觉得要看这个finding有没有被拿来支持某些东西,如果有的话,那他就是个evidence妥妥的。但是如果没有,我觉得就要分析一下下了,这个finding到底是从一堆研究中发现的一些个规律呢,还是用它去证明某些东西呢。在这个题里啊,注意这句话“ Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the
conclusion drawn by some commentators that。。。”(我认为这句话才是本文的中心观点,你觉得内~)也就是这个fact是被作者拿来去warrant一些人的conclusion了,所以应该是可以算作是evidence的~

啊啊啊我说的有点支离破碎,希望没有误导你。。。只是自己的一丢丢小观点,open to discuss

TOP

哈哈,怎么会误导呢~能看到别人的思路简直太好了~!读了下,这个的确应该是main conclusion,最后一句话,反而像inference了~

TOP

many thank

TOP

xie  xie

TOP

谢谢

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看