返回列表 发帖

3道题请教

1. In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant office, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses ans laboratories. The govenment, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

a. Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
e. Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.

答案是A, 为什么E不对?

2. An advertisement designed to convince readers of the great durability og automobiles manufactured by the Deluxe Motor Car Company cities as evidence the fact that over half of all automobiles built by the company since 1970 are still on the road today, compared to no more than a third for any other manufacturer.

Which of the following , if truem most strongly supports the adverusement;s argument?

答案是The number of automobiles built by Deluxe each year has not increased sharply since 1970. 请解释为什么.

3. In the US, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called "pure aquariums" but , for fewer than one quarter og all vistors to zoos, which usually include a "zoo aquarium" of relatively modest scope.
Which of the following, if true most helps to account for the difference described above between vistors to zoos and vistors tro pure aquariums?
a. In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.
b. Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos. whereas only a few large metropolitan area have pure aquariums.
d. people who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are are people who do not visit a zoo.

the answer is B. Please explain.

THX!!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2002-11-1 13:50:36编辑过]

收藏 分享

1。结论:政府建新工程没有财政浪费
   假设:调整现有房屋怎么也比不上建新工程来的有效,这保证了结论推出。
   E 要确定没有其他更合适的方式才行,并没有提及“调整现有房屋”究竟是否更有效。
2。如果70年后,每年生产量递增,那么超过一半的汽车还在路上跑的原因就未必是耐久性 了。比如:70年生产1辆,90年生产10000辆,91路上跑的必超过一半!   
3。每个地方都有zoo,但不是每个地方都有水族馆。
   作为游客,自然会去自己不常去的。

TOP

THX.  
1. E中其他方式不就包括了关于现有房屋的考虑吗?

TOP

包括。刚才没解释清楚。
E的核心问题在于:政府被要求这么做,但实际怎样做的,并不知道。
                 如果真这样做了,那就是“政府建新工程没有财政浪费”的假设条件。
                 但若没做,就成为不了假设条件。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看