Linda Kerber argued in the mid-
1980’s that after the American Revolution
(1775-1783), an ideology of “republican
Line motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-
(5) cational opportunities for women in the
LACE w:st="on">United StatesLACE>. Kerber maintained that
the leaders of the new nation wanted
women to be educated in order to raise
politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citi-
(10) zenry was considered essential to the
success of the country’s republican form
of government; virtue was to be instilled
not only by churches and schools, but
by families, where the mother’s role
(15) was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber,
motherhood became pivotal to the fate
of the republic, providing justification for
an unprecedented attention to female
education.
(20) Introduction of the republican moth-
erhood thesis dramatically changed
historiography. Prior to Kerber’s work,
educational historians barely mentioned
women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929
(25) work is the notable exception. Examining
newspaper advertisements for acade-
mies, Woody found that educational
opportunities increased for both girls
and boys around 1750. Pointing to “An
(30) Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting
a shift in view, Woody also claimed that
practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution.
Woody’s evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
regarding female education, although it
may have accelerated earlier trends.
Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends,
making it difficult to determine to what
extent the Revolution really changed
women’s lives.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q10:
According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was
- innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence
- exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution
- unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices
- controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys
- atypical in that it examined the education of girls
答案：B。文中没有提到，只说因为他关注了妇女的教育。
Q12:
The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the LACE w:st="on">United StatesLACE>, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?
- The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century
- The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution
- The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution
- Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century
- Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government
答案：C。估计是从最后的那段话里看出来的，但是确实有点不明白其含义，尤其是"the trend"到底是啥意思？ | 
