- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 5097
- 经验
- 5097 点
- 威望
- 25 点
- 金钱
- 8633 ¥
- 魅力
- 4797
|
[Page 2 of 3]
Q: How do European business schools differ from U.S. business schools in terms of what they expect and look for in applicants?
A: A majority of European programs are on a one-year format, which often means that there isn't time for a summer internship. So applicants will need very clear career goals to maximize the benefit of a shorter program. In addition, European schools focus on bringing in students with broad international perspectives.
Q: How do top schools view free spirits who take a significant break from their professional careers to pursue artistic, spiritual, or recreational activities for 6 to 12 months?
A: This can be a tremendous advantage, assuming that the activity you've pursued relates somehow to your prior experiences and future goals. So, for example, if you've always had a passion for geopolitics and decided to take a six-month volunteer post with USAID and can indicate how this will improve your ability to contribute on the MBA campus, then you'll be better off than the applicant who has pursued a more standard path. If you pursued something that has no relation to your career goals or past experiences, then it may be harder to justify the break.
Q: What strengths are most important for people applying to MBA programs directly after finishing an undergraduate degree? Does entering into an MBA program so soon put you at a disadvantage after the MBA?
A: There has been a lot of talk about a "youth movement" in MBA admissions. Younger applicants will be closely scrutinized for evidence of leadership, whether through a college activity or a summer job. They'll also be scrutinized for academic abilities. But at the end of the day, what's most important to schools is what the candidate has done with his or her time on the planet. Having said that, I typically do not counsel undergrads to apply directly to business school, except in rare cases.
Q: Do you think schools are increasingly counting on more years of productivity after B-school? How can a 35-year-old address that when he or she is up against people in their late 20s?
A: If your goal is to enter an entry-level analyst program on Wall Street at age 35 or more, you may face stiff competition from your classmates. Older applicants typically need to have goals that are deemed realistic for someone graduating in their age group. For example, a military person who's coming to an MBA at age 35 and making a career change can benefit.
Q: Here's a question from an audience member who calls himself "a regular Joe Shmoe": I work, work, work and then I take care of my family. I don't have many extracurricular activities [to show on my application] besides babysitting. How can I make my application stand apart from the others?
A: Admissions officers understand that work and family commitments can be incredibly demanding. The key is to demonstrate to the committee how you might spend your time on campus outside of the classroom. And this may involve highlighting previous activities from college and giving the committee a sense that, when free of your work obligations and focused on MBA study, you'll be an active contributor to the MBA campus and community.
Q: What's a good strategy for contacting professors at a school that an MBA applicant is interested in? How does the applicant get his or her name known among the faculty before his or her application is submitted?
A: It makes a lot of sense to communicate with students and professors who are studying [or researching] your field of interest. Engaging professors and students in informational discussions or interviews can really pay dividends when it comes time to write your essays and persuade the school that you've done your homework. At the same time, you can't expect a discussion with a professor to serve the purpose of affecting your admissions status "behind the scenes." Professors see right through students who contact them for no reason other than to try to get their name acrosstheir desk.
Q: How do you feel the recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court will affect minority admissions at the top business schools, in particular at the University of California at Berkeley's Haas School of Business and University of Texas at Austin's McCombs School of Business, which have done away with race-based admissions in the past?
A: I don't think it will have an impact on admissions to the top MBA programs, primarily because the level of competition among applicants is incredibly high. MBA programs have the fortunate situation of being able to build truly diverse classes composed of highly qualified applicants. They're not doing what Michigan was doing in the law school. The schools have gone on record saying they're still thinking about this issue.
Q: What are the chances of a school admitting someone with a good grade point average (GPA), an average GMAT score, good essays, good work experience, and good recommendations? How much does the GMAT count?
A: The beauty of MBA admissions process is that it's a multivariable equation. The GMAT is one variable with several components, such as the breakdown of one's score, the number of times the test was taken, and whether or not the student is a native English speaker. So students have a chance to compensate for a GMAT score that's below the average. This is typically done via the other academic metrics, such as [the applicant's] GPA, quality of coursework, and reputation of the undergraduate institution [the applicant attended].
Typically, your academic profile is assessed through the GMAT and academic experience, so work experience, essays, and recommendations will not typically be considered in lieu of a low GMAT score.
Q: Any insight into how universities look at applicants who have retaken the GMAT to get a higher score?
A: The short answer is that MBA programs focus on your best score. In addition, a student with a low score who retakes the test and performs better will look good in the eyes of the admissions committee for recognizing a weakness and seeking to address it. Reapplicants with first-time low scores who don't retake the test when they apply again may be frowned upon.
Q: Another variation on that admissions equation: How important are promotions and large salary increases when an admissions committee is measuring an applicant's success at work? If an applicant gets good recommendations and has discussed growth in terms of responsibilities, will this be sufficient?
A: Ideally, a candidate can point to increases in responsibility via promotions and salary increase, since these are the principal ways for people to put their money where their mouth is. At the same time, strong recommendations can go a long way toward helping a candidate who doesn't have salary increases or promotions to point to -- particularly in these economic times, because it's understood that you may not get a promotion [or raise]. |
|