og12 113 修饰问题

tofreesky

113. Because there are provisions of the new martiime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
(A) Because there are provisions of the new martiime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas they have already stimulated
(B) Because the new martime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated
(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new martime code, already stimulating.
(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated
(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new martime code, which is already stimulatin

答案是B，问题如下：
Q1，C中黄色影印部分这种介宾结构都是就近修饰的么？
Q2，C中红色影印部分不是SCO,doing的结构么，不是表是结果么？为什么OG上说不清楚是谁stimulate?

haze619

个人觉得……是不是因为C中主语是tiny islets,所以变成了

islets stimulating了，于是就错了……

tofreesky

谁能帮我翻译下这句话啊。。。我一直以为就是islets是主语引起了后面的事情。。。

TopTerminator

应该是 new maritime code 是主语

条例才会 stimulate dispute

而小岛不会 stimulate dispute

adolfgao

我认为already stimulating也可以作为之前整句话的结果，之前整句话作为-ing的逻辑主语，不知道OG中为什么认为-ing主语不清。

同问楼主的问题，为什么under provisions of the new maritime code修饰对象不清，是否因为距离谓语动词太远的关系？