返回列表 发帖

请教,OG11-CR-9 《关于政府减少学校财政拨款的问题》

mayor: in each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures or essential services.

Which of the following, if true, most stronly supports the mayor's conclusion?

A /The city's school have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services
B /Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city's schools to provide some nonessential services
C / Price estimates quoted to the city's school for the procision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school-funding cut.
D / few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city's schools
E / The city's school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts

呼呼,终于打完了。找了好久没找到OG11电子版。但是这个题目我真是好纠结,好纠结,完全不懂~~~麻烦解答一下啦,感激不尽
另外如果谁知道哪里有OG11电子版下载能不能麻烦发一下链接,好多题目不会做哦~~
收藏 分享

B ? 目前资金充足,足够让city's school 提供nonessential service,所以还能在cut?

TOP

每次city削减学校资金,学校抱怨这个削减逼迫学校减少重要services的

花费
但每次学校实际减少的都是不重要的sevices的花费
所以学校还能在不影响重要sevices花费的前提下继续cuts(conclusion)

B选项:还有充足的资金供给不重要的services花费
这不就说明还有钱能被继续cuts而不影响重要的services么?

TOP

啊!!!我懂了。。。我怎么之前就脑袋一直短路呢~~
恩恩,答案就是B,我看解释看了N遍都没看明白,囧
太谢谢啦~~

TOP

我读长难句的能力也不行,复杂点儿句子一遍就搞不定了~~大家一起加油哈~~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看