OG12 104

jasonlove

看了OG12分类by毛毛还是没有理解 为什么C不是竞争性的店就能切断逻辑链了，感觉题干本来就没逻辑。。。

jasonlove

104.Although the discount stores in Goreville’s centralshopping district are expected to close within fiveyears as a result of competition from a SpendLessdiscount department store that just opened, thoselocations will not stay vacant for long. In the five yearssince the opening of Colson’s, a non-discountdepartment store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district thatclosed because it could not compete with Colson’s.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakensthe argument?
(A) Many customers of Colson’s are expected to doless shopping there than they did before theSpendLess store opened.
(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in thecentral shopping district since Colson’s openedhave been discount stores.
(C) At present, the central shopping district has asmany stores operating in it as it everhad.
(D) Over the course of the next five years, it isexpected that Goreville’s population will grow ata faster rate than it has for the past severaldecades.
(E) Many stores in the central shopping district selltypes of merchandise that are not available ateither SpendLess or Colson’s.

flyfairy019

我今天认真分析了一下这个题，想和大家讨论一下。因为我想通它花了点时间
首先，一看是weaken类型的题目，我就想先找出结论，因为没有结论指示词，我花了半天才找出结论是“those locations will not stay vacant for long”，而后面那句话“In the ? ve years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s. ”实际上是对结论的推理，也就是解释为什么会得出结论。至此可以发现其实它是用了一个类比的方法，用五年前C的情况，类比现在G和S的情况。

好了，题目搞明白了，我开始用lawyer关于WEAKEN类问题的方法进行解答，lawyer说在找出结论后，要注意结论的具体性，我们可以看到，结论的情况实际上是在说两个“discount”的商店，而理由部分的C商店的情况是“NONdiscount”的，注意到这个特殊性之后我就得出了B


也不知道分析的方法对不对，想和大家讨论下，我觉得这道题蛮麻烦的。