- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1000
- 经验
- 1000 点
- 威望
- 99 点
- 金钱
- 99 ¥
- 魅力
- 99
|
prep 197
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
我想问的是E 中giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture怎么样改才不产生修饰上的歧义? 这种分词结构不是修饰前面句子的主语吗? 难道也可以就近修饰? |
|