返回列表 发帖

prep 197

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

我想问的是E 中giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture怎么样改才不产生修饰上的歧义?     这种分词结构不是修饰前面句子的主语吗? 难道也可以就近修饰?
收藏 分享

这个题正确的应该是D吧?give和creat是并列的结构不存在修饰结构吖~

TOP

PREP语法笔记上面说GIVING修饰CREATED,所以我就比较不理解

TOP

有木有NN 帮忙解答下~~~~~我觉得giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture应该修饰The systematic clearing 吧?

TOP

不是it is... that 的强调句,这种结构可以去掉不影响意思。。。

TOP

Me again...

建议看看manhattan关于modifier那章吧~【,V-ing】这个形式是一个【verb modifier】,它本质上修饰的是动词。只是,它很特殊在于【它在修饰动词的时候,也连带着要求主语是V-ing的句子主语】。所以我们经常说,【,V-ing】结构要求逻辑主语,但是本质上,它还是修饰动词的。

TOP

原来这样!!!! 谢谢LZ~~~~~我要再好好看看manhattan关于modifier那章。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看