返回列表 发帖

求助,prep2 eassy11-36

Essay #11.316




Most farmers attempting to control slugs and snails turn to baited slug poison, or molluscicide, which usually consists of a bran pellet containing either methiocarb or metaldehyde.Both chemicals are neurotoxins that disrupt that part of the brain charged with making the mouth move in a coordinated fashion--the "central pattern generator"--as the slug feeds.Thus, both neurotoxins, while somewhat effective, interfere with the slugs' feeding behavior and limit their ingestion of the poison, increasing the probability that some will stop feeding before receiving a lethal dose.Moreover, slugs are not the only consumers of these poisons:methiocarb may be toxic to a variety of species, including varieties of worms, carabid beetles, and fish.








Researchers are experimenting with an alternative compound based on aluminum, which may solve these problems, but this may well have a limited future as we learn more about the hazards of aluminum in the environment.For example, some researchers suggest that acid rain kills trees by mobilizing aluminum in the soil, while others have noted that the human disease Alzheimer's is more prevalent in areas where levels of aluminum in the soil are high.With farmers losing as much as 20 percent of their crops to slugs and snails even after treatment with currently available molluscicides, there is considerable incentive for researchers to come up with better and environmentally safer solutions.








Question #36.316-01








In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with








(A) describing the limitations of molluscicides that affect feeding behavior




(B) proposing alternatives to current methods of controlling slugs and snails




(C) emphasizing the need for an alternative to currently available molluscicides




(D) explaining how molluscicides are used to control slugs and snails




(E) criticizing the use of hazardous material for controlling slugs and snails
这题答案选C,请问怎么是强调两种方法替换的需要呢?为什么不是
E呢?


收藏 分享

同问:为何选C?
C对应的是文章的最后一句。但不是文章主体。我想主体是分析各种药物利弊吧?

TOP

文章第一段说杀虫剂有效但是有些弊端。
第二段提出解决弊端的方法但是受环境条件的限制,失败。
后半部说农民用现在的杀虫剂损失很大,研究人员得研究出新产品。
文章架构分析完了,来看选项。
A 说细节不要
B只是第二段提到一点,说的部分,不要
C强调需要替代品,和作者的观点一致,留着
D说细节不要
E批评了危害材料的使用,只是在第一段最后一句提到,但是从整篇文章架构来看
作者的重点不是要去批判它,而是要找到替代它的产品。
以上分析请用辩证方法来看,仅供参考!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看