PREP1-Q27~NN们，来帮帮我，我逻辑不好，请多多包涵~

jenningsyao

Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage.Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones.Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.

(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.

(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.

答案是C。本人选的是A。为什么不能理解第二个粗体部分是结论呢？
求解~

zjhzkingsam

第一粗体部分讲到种子非常贵，并且比起普通的植物，这新的需要更多的肥料和水来好好生长，明着意思是说农民买这种子划不来，但第二粗体部分说道由于消费者对无杀虫剂水果，蔬菜，谷物的需求的增长，这种基因的种子还是有可能变得很普遍。前后明显是对比，转转。 结论应该是农民还是会使用这种基因种子。

jenningsyao

可是你还是没有说明为什么第二个粗体部分不是conclusion啊~这位NN~

mop000

这是来自manhattan的解释。

把文章分一下段落：
1. Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. 2. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. 3. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. 4. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

The structure of this argument is: 1 = background fact。2, therefore 3。However, 4 (which weakens conclusion 3)。If you figure out that much, then it's clear that #3 is the CONCLUSION. The single most important thing to do on critical reasoning is to figure out what's the conclusion. A doesn't make sense because the second boldface in this case is not really a claim; it's a logical consequence of the preceding fact, and so should be regarded as another fact. Remember that the word “conclusion” should only be used to refer to claims, not facts.

因此第二个粗体部分是一个事实，而不是一个结论，一个claims。