费费逻辑 121

wadsoda

121. Observatory director: Some say that funding the mega telescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have satisfied their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.


If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the mega telescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?


A.It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.
B.It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.
C.It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.
D.It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual senses of “benefit”.
E.It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.


参考思路：指出推论错误。



(E) It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications. 举的例子不具有可比性



其实我是题目看不明白。。。谁能帮忙分析一下思路？~

queenie924

有的人说投资在MT上只会对那些将来要用MT的航天员有用， 这个危险的观点 如果放在M N E 这些人的工作上 将会使他们满足于他们的研究 并且把一些紧接在这些研究之后的有益的工作剥夺 比如说R的发展

文章的逻辑不是一个完全意义上的对比

songxuebest

题干中说快给我们钱吧，我们的研究工作就如同麦斯韦尔牛顿爱因斯坦一样，将会造福全人类
E选项就是说：呸，想和这些大牛比，你们也配

不过 This dangerous point of view...would have satisfied their research 这一半看着不通啊

wadsoda

LS的解释好通俗易懂！！ 谢谢~