- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1620
- 经验
- 1620 点
- 威望
- 161 点
- 金钱
- 161 ¥
- 魅力
- 161
|
刚好我也看到这道题,看到曼哈顿论坛里Ron对这道题的解释,非常有用 :
)
"occasionally, when it is completely unambiguous, "which" can refer
to a whole NOUN PHRASE that immediately precedes the comma."
有的时候,当在完全没有歧义的情况下,which可以指代前面的整个名词词组,
也就是x of y的形式。
“in this case, this noun phrase is "X's letters to Y". (note that
this noun phrase, as a unit, does immediately precede the comma.)”
注意到这道题里,这个名词词组"X's letters to Y是作为一个整体,并且直接
紧跟在逗号的前面,并且which指代这个人在这句话里是完全没有逻辑的,所以
这里的which就可以指代前面整个名词词组。
Here's the basic summary:
if you have "X of Y, which..."
then:
* if Y works as the antecedent of "which", then "which" should stand
for Y.
* if Y doesn't work as the antecedent, but "X of Y" DOES work, then
"which" can stand for "X of Y".
当看到“X of Y, which..”的形式的时候,如果它可以指代前面的Y,那么它
就指代前面的Y;如果Y不能作为先行词,但是X of Y可以,那么它就可以指代X
of Y. |
|