返回列表 发帖

gwd-24-7

GWD-24

24-7 Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since

(A) when elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.

(B) foraging elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.

(C) some of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has been allowed to return to its natural state.

(D) elephants tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source

(E) elephant sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.

答案是D,我觉得可以接受,但是B也可以接受呀,为什么不对呢?

收藏 分享

B和持续的破坏没什么关系啊。这里要看看前面的逻辑关系。前面说即使保留的可以提供足够的食物,破坏也是会继续的这是因为........,这里你加上B会发现前后没逻辑关系。
把所有的困苦都看做是有意义的,是生命对你的磨练,也许,是为了让你成大事而做准备。

TOP

懂了,强,谢谢了!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看